The story of
planned reforestation of the township fields could start in any of several
places. One start could be its original deforestation in the westward expansion
in this country following the Revolutionary War. Or, the story could begin with
the acquisition of the park acreage by our federal government, with no plan in
place, to provide a recreation area. Or the story could begin with some
lightbulb moment, in a peripheral agency to the park, that fifty years of attempting
to make the park acreage what it is not, a bucolic hamlet, has failed, and it is
time to give the land back to its beginnings.
The great
westward movement began in earnest little more than two hundred years ago. My
end of the state was formed under the Northwest Ordinance, a piece of
legislation Americans should be extraordinarily proud of. It established
government by and for the people through the establishment of townships.
Equally important, it excluded slavery north of the Ohio River.
Of immediate importance, the settlement of the frontier housed the floods of
immigrants, both from the eastern states, and from most of Europe. There was
starvation, there were wars, in Europe. People moved west, from Europe and from
the thirteen original colonies. They moved to find a better life; they moved in
cramped and endangered cargo vessels, even as indentured servants, and as
prisoners to the penal colony of Georgia.
The trees came
down, log homes and barns went up, and the pioneers, who started scratching a
living at the beginning of the nineteenth century, wound up feeding the nation
and then much of the world by the twentieth century. The Cuyahoga River Valley
contributed to the growth and success of the nation. Food production, mining
and manufacture was transported by canal, by river, by the lake to the world.
But, by the
last quarter of the twentieth century, the valley was a bywater. It’s farming
days had ended, its transportation glory days were over.
Boston
Township, my township, was not clear cut, like so much of the land turned to
farming. As the end of the last glacial moraine, there were ravines, ledges,
ridges. And, the great Cuyahoga River. In the thirty years I’ve lived here, the
river has pushed the flood plain out and out. Akron-Peninsula Road, that I
travel almost every time I am out and about, in order to go and come back, has
been compromised by the river, across from the Brandywine Golf Course. The
river has severely undercut the road. Absorb that: thousands of people travel
daily on a road with a river ten feet below.
The road is not a bridge, it is a road with eroding substructure.
There is no
solution that even a bazillion dollars can buy, and so they just dump dams of
rock and dirt over the edge, to hold the river at bay until it cannot.
During the
presidency of Gerald Ford, some clever inhabitants of the valley, well to do descendants
of the early industrial barons, realized they could retain a green space
between Akron and Cleveland, provide a recreational area for the large
population of the old Connecticut Western Reserve, and unload their own estates
on the government, at taxpayer expense, by forming a park For the Greater Good.
Most long
time readers know how outrageous I found the formation of the park, much of it
by eminent domain. No plan was ever presented. No hearings were held. The park came
about by sheer will, and forced purchase of four hundred homes here in the
valley. I was the Fiscal Officer of the township for thirteen years. I put
together a web site that a town historian and I used to document the sad abuse
of the valley by our federal and local governments. The web site is bostontownship.org, and the left side column contains a link “History”. I
invite you to begin with “For all people, For all time” and read through the
“Park Service Land Grab”. You may not realize your government has done this all
over the country. For the Greater Good.
This park
has been through several iterations, probably because there never was a plan to
make and sustain a park. The most egregious, in my estimation, has been the
intent to “return” Boston Township to a hamlet. We are not a hamlet. We never
were. There is no legal designation of “hamlet” in this country. We are the
same township as we were formed to be, by the Northwest Ordinance. Hamletizing
us is to Disneytize us.
The Peoples’Park, that I documented, is gone. It was bulldozed into hills and dales, to
form a charming entrance to the new Visitor’s Center. All that remains are the
stone urn, the sandstone surround, the flag pole. There is not enough land left
for township residents to respectfully form up and proceed to the Cemetery on
Memorial Day without a permit to use park property. The Township Trustee and I
had a sad chuckle. As soon as one or the other or both of us are gone, that
will be gone, too.
Let’s
summarize what I could have said. Once much of the eastern half of
the country was forested, and supported the lives of a few million natives.
Then the continent was literally overrun by white people with black slaves.
These inhabitants clear cut much of the land to support not only themselves,
but much of the world. Two hundred years later, the extent of the damage is not
only apparent, the damage is claiming the land, to the detriment of the
people living here.
Effort to
preserve some of the land in its natural state has been made since Grant made
Yellowstone a national park. As decent an idea as are national parks, they
frequently enhance damage to the land as they flounder to make a park for
people. Enter another longtime scapegoat of mine, Conservancies.
Until
recently I only saw them as another land grabbing machine. This problem of the
Cuyahoga River undercutting Akron-Peninsula Road caused me to look more
closely. A Conservancy has purchased the golf course along the road being
undercut. In enough time, they will own the River, before it owns them.
First, I
looked at the definition of Conservancy: an organization that works to protect animals, plants, and
natural resources especially by purchasing and caring for areas of land.
The
other day I was dumbstruck at the sight a broad slope of the old Black farm,
white with sapling protectors, planted with thousands of new trees. Everywhere
in the park I travel these days, there are tree saplings. I began reading
current articles on reforestation. Many area acres are being purchased by
conservancies, with the intent of returning the land, at minimum, to the
woodland, farmland balance achieved by the original European founders about
fifty years into the westward movement, 1850ish.
We need
to restore the thick root systems that impede storm water runoff, provides
habitat for breeding and migratory birds. We are past the point of “letting
nature take its course.” We must manage the landscape to return to some
normalcy, if possible. Multiflora roses, planted as hedgerows a century ago,
are overrunning natural habitats, supplanting natural saplings, for instance.
Two
hundred years of damage cannot be overcome, even in two hundred years. And we
do not have two hundred years left. Google land reclamation in your area. There
are conservancies across the country, happy to give a short course on good
plans in your area, and give you a shovel and a sack of saplings.
This
exercise has dragged me past my loathing of the park for damage it has added to
the Cuyahoga River Valley and to my township. I still find it an example of wrongheaded
thinking. But understanding the purpose of conservancies and finding there are
hundreds of conservancies in my area alone makes me wonder: what if we can return
Ohio to a continual canopy of trees for aliens to land in, in two hundred
years.
Our conservancy programme here in Newfoundland was disbanded as the volunteer committee disbanded due to government disinterest. They were disgusted.
ReplyDeleteGood luck in your venture. I'm afraid corporate interests outweigh anyone else.
XO
WWW
Wow, well written and I appreciate reading and learning from this post. Your knowledge and experience as Fiscal Officer is impressive and even more is your passion and concern. I can not stand government groups that bend the laws in land and money gubbing all to their own benefit. Especially when they come in and force people to sell their homes and move.
ReplyDeleteI did Google "land reclamation" in my county and found a lot of confusing information and much of it was ten years old. I will need to do a little research on this to find out more. Thank you for making me aware of this.
You should be proud for all you have done and continue to do. I understand how frustrating it must be to you. Unfortunately in our world and especially our country money seems to be the only language spoken and is often at the bottom of many wrongs done.
This should be printed in your local paper. It's a very fine piece of journalism.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of aliens landing in a forested, canopied land. Maybe they'd appreciate it.
There is a lot to digest here, Joanne. I read it twice! Land restoration should be a topic high on the agenda of every citizen, but I fear it is not. With careful planning for the long term land can be restored to its original state, or close to it, and all of humanity would benefit from a functioning natural ecosystem. Will it happen? I doubt it.
ReplyDeleteSuperb, Joanne! This should be copied and used just by changing names of your area for our own. Only 200 years it took to open eyes and feel any guilt.
ReplyDeleteThe greater good is neither good nor great.
ReplyDeleteLove,
Janie
I second what Janie Junebug posted.
ReplyDeleteI think land conservancies are, generally speaking, a good thing. Anything that preserves natural habitat is a bonus in today's world.
ReplyDeleteI'm quite concerned about the thousands of people traveling over a road that is being eroded by the river underneath it. Is it at all possible to build a proper bridge or some other overpass?
ReplyDeleteI local government is doing a land grab here too, not for a park, but to widen the intersections of several roads. Many houses and trees will be lost and the widened intersections will have bottlenecks where they feed into the existing roads that haven't been widened to match the bigger intersections....talk about shortsightedness!
Thank you for your expert analysis of this situation. It's so enlightening to read the history and reasoning behind the decisions, even though heartbreaking, too.
ReplyDeleteYou really know this issue. I grasp some of it.
ReplyDeleteThis was complex to read and I think I understand it but I'm not sure I do. Totally off the subject just a bit but I wonder why so much new building has to be done when there are so many vacant buildings. Why can't they be re-purposed rather than potentially cutting down trees for new developments?
ReplyDeletebetty
Sigh.
ReplyDeleteAnd hiss and spit.
Time is fast running out. World wide.
Great post. Back in the nineteen seventies Hawkwind wrote a song called: We Took The Wrong Steps Years Ago. It's still relevant today.
ReplyDeleteWhen it is good vs. greed, greed always wins. Here we have over-development. Many are fighting this. We will lose.
ReplyDeleteNicely done, Joanne
ReplyDeletethanks for the history lesson. nature will eventually recover if we humans leave it alone long enough. but we may not survive the wait. so yeah, buy available land and plant trees, save the topsoil before it's all washed away, encourage creatures.
ReplyDeleteI'm all for preserving natural places and if that can't be done then working to return places to their original condition. And at the bottom of all the development in the past and undercutting efforts for the future is the single overriding factor of the earth's exploding population growth. It's not slowing down as quickly as it needs to.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the well-written background to your area. The river versus road situation is rather scary.
Beautifully written, I learnt something new tonight!
ReplyDeleteElection years are ideal for raising issues
ReplyDeleteThank you! This is a wonderful piece full of history and information.
ReplyDeleteIt's all a balancing act but we mustn't give up even when it gets difficult. Every town needs citizens like you to make us keep on trying.
ReplyDeleteVery well said, Joanne.
ReplyDelete